"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." – Danish

This week I tackled a junk drawer. This one was in a piece of furniture we moved to the basement and it held some old phones, a lot of cords, and many, many, keys. Along with these remnants were a couple thumb drives. I popped one into my computer and up popped a presentation from 2013.
Back then, I was a year into consulting and one of my go-to ideas was to show people how their prospects were using Google. At the time, B2C advertising tactics on Google Ads were significantly ahead of B2B ad tactics and I thought I had a window of time for showing people "the future of B2B lead generation." Especially long, complex sales cycles.
11 years later I have a report.
I was wrong. The opportunity for B2B sellers is still there over a decade later.
What changed? What did I miss?
For starters, the tactics I am referring to are a small part of a big cycle. There is a lot more money being spent by B2B sellers on the search platforms, just not in the sliver of tactics I was promoting. The more I think about it, reviewing proposals, completed projects, and advisory work, I have another reason.
Quota.
I teach people to talk about more than budget, because money isn't the only resource. Another resource is labor. And the one quota falls into is the third big resource to consider, timeframe. When I look over all the prospects, proposals, and work over the last decade, the client needing to hit a mark/quota in a specific time frame is the biggest determinant of which tactics are installed, and which ones get pushed to the side.
Zig Ziglar had a quote that went something like, you need to make measurable progress in a reasonable amount of time, that's why those third grade chairs are so small.
Wait, I'm wrong about that too. It's Jim Rohn, and he said, "Life asks us to make measurable progress in reasonable time. That’s why they make those fourth grade chairs so small – so you won’t fit in them at age twenty-five!"
When the time frame allows for reasonable progress, my tactic is a winner. On the other hand, when we need a specific result sooner rather than later, there are better ways to get there.
As for that 2013 presentation, I reran the examples and found my recommendations still apply. The firm I presented to has been sold, so I sent it to a competitor to see if it might help them.
I'll check my prediction again in 10 years. Maybe something will change by then. I'm good with being right once every 20 years.
|