“A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers.” Plato
We're having more and more discussions about measuring the marketing team's results. With cross-device tracking, biometric matching capabilities, and massive databases in the cloud, it feels like we should be able to track everything. That leads to requests for metrics and KPIs. That leads to new money being excitedly spent and new tools being deployed.
Which eventually leads back to me. You see, when a team spends money and doesn't see a change in those KPIs or metrics, I get called in. "What are we missing?" they ask.
One thing, I reply. You're trying to be data driven, instead of data informed.

As great as our tracking technology is, it's not perfect. And even if it were perfect, our prospect's decision making is so chaotic, it defy's technology's attempts to paint a clear picture. So don't focus on that tracking bulls-eye, instead, widen your focus to account for changes at the macro level.
If the bulls-eye is what we can attribute to a prospect by tracking across all devices, IPs, and CRM entries, that's only a fraction of what trips our measurement devices. And what trips our measurement devices is only a fraction of what actually happens.
So focus on the outer cirlcle where all new business comes is registered. That's accurate because it's money in the bank. Take note of the sales you can attribute to tripping some triggers. Then consider the bulls-eye, those sales you know you can track 100% to multiple touches. Let that information help you make decisions, but don't assume it tells you everything you need to know. Be data informed, not data driven.
(And consider this, by the time the robots have it all figured out, they'll be selling to each other.)
|